Thursday, May 23, 2013
I have a blog IMITATING ME YAYY IM POPULAR. Ralph Nader, May 22nd Update, and the idea that will save the world.
Just a note to readers: there is a fake blog imitating me. It's this, click at own risk. weird, sketchy website LOL (SMILEFORSENSE.BLOGpsOT.COM)
fuckin posers. <.<... >.>...
People like to blame Nader for the Bush dynasties rule. That's fine, but it makes you look like an idiot. It's not Nader's "fault" for ruining Gore's chance, it's the people's fault for voting BUSH IN. Stop deflecting and own up to the pure stupidity that is the Ameritard majority.
I can say this, because I'm 'merican.
Patriots fight Wars.
Patriots Change Laws
Patriots chastise bad Policy and ineffective Leadership
Al Gore and Nader should have run together, it would have been better insofar as the American people not being victim to a greedy, retarded hillbilly.
I don't need to even post this. The entire world knows he is retarded; but that's what American's like about him...They like to feel that they aren't as retarded as they think they are because if this guy can be president, a broken twig in a steaming pile of elephant shit can also be a president.
And the fucked up part is, even the twig knows when the shit stinks.
George W Bush: Full Retard- YouTube
Anyways.
SO, yeah. Nader is a fantastic guy; and doesn't deserve the rap he got. His heart was in the right place; and to this day he continues to share passion and love in his work.
Nader Organization
Here is the most recent update; and I'll comment in bold.
More Exposés, Less Action
There must be reasons why people are weary of the flood of excellent documentary films, books and articles showing us what the corporate state – that is, the fusion of big business and government to constantly serve the former against the peoples’ interest – is doing to our beloved country. aka eating itself alive
We are in a golden age of exposés, detailed revelations about out-of-control polluters, corporate tax escapees, corruption of government, cheating of consumers, abandonment of workers, freezing or reduction of wages, and a general hijacking of America for perpetual wars, militarism and profiteering. Even from mainstream television, newspapers and magazines, these exposés pour out in numbers that far exceed our weakened democracy’s ability to respond. That's not what Fox said! -_______________-
Why does so little change when the truths, the facts and the grim realities are available on request? In the past more prosecutors, legislators, and regulators would be informed and goaded by exposés. The wider media would echo such responses which further encouraged these enforcers to challenge wrongdoing. A cycle of public agitation and official responses kept things moving.
But there were fewer exposés and therefore less information overload. Today, exposés are running into each other and receiving smaller audiences. The shrinking mass media does not give the authors and producers the time that was afforded their predecessors.
Nothing has replaced the Phil Donahue Show that reveled in showcasing injustices.The Today Show and Good Morning America have fewer authors on their stages. Charlie Rose is heavily into entertainers, favored columnist Tom Friedman, and business celebrities. Once welcoming radio talk show hosts are off the air, replaced by curled lip ideologues or soft, fluffy commentators. Local daily city television talk shows that made author tours successful and often would jump-start investigative reports are nearly extinct, replaced by syndicated programs featuring touchy-feely or sadomasochistic fare. Bill Maher's show is pretty good too, imo.
This new media landscape is more hostile to the civic community and discourages the younger generation from believing that change is truly within our grasp. As the years pass, our examples of national re-directions, as if people matter, come from the 1960s and ’70s. There are dwindling illustrations from more variously-troubled, recent decades, even as the information revolution should have accelerated the pace of change. The younger generation, aka me, is not discouraged, we are enraged, yet calm; calm like a bomb!
There may be proportionately as much civic activism today, though the smaller marches and rallies and much less mass media coverage do not demonstrate that there is as much public protest. What is certain is that there are now far more problems, declines in livelihoods, and other deprivations and lockouts from participating in our legislative and executive governments and courts. It doesn’t help that there are far fewer differences between the two major parties and far more gridlocks, garnished by far more campaign cash, resulting in chronic avoidance or postponements of remedies.
Let’s go back to the exposés. What can documentary film makers, for example, do beyond putting out a fine product for theater audiences and DVD purchasers? Educate, one organization. One charity.
An ongoing development pushing the envelope toward change comes from Eugene Jarecki’s documentary “The House I Live In.” Saturating the country with his public and private showings, action meetings with prison wardens and lawmakers – urban and rural – and continuing media coverage, he seeks to make his film “a widely-recognized and galvanizing tool for a national rethinking of America’s drug control policies.” His two-year plan of coalition building and direct legislative pressure is breathtaking in its scope, depth, agility and strategic thinking (for more information visit the website here).
Mr. Jarecki is plowing new ground through relentless follow-through – an extension more authors, capable of doing so, should undertake. After all they have proven themselves as knowledgeable, interesting communicators.
Another contemporary documentary receiving serious follow-up by its production team is “The Invisible War” – the story of rape and other sexual assaults within the U.S. military. This film, directed and written by Kirby Dick, is being taken seriously by the Pentagon which is showing it to commanders and high-ranking military leaders. Attendance is often required thanks to a few enlisted commanders and constant prodding from the filmmakers.
Realistically, many reporters and producers are unable to pursue their findings into the realms of action. Often they are onto their next investigative project and are economically hard-pressed. Here is where some farseeing foundations or enlightened wealthy persons can make a difference by funding small civic groups taking the findings and recommendations into the public policy arenas backed by civic mobilization. After all, civic advocates have proven their worth over the long run.
Or existing groups, such as the anti-nuclear steadfast organizations – Beyond Nuclear and Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS) – can be the beneficiaries of funders viewing documentaries such “Knocking on the Devil’s Door: Our Deadly Nuclear Legacy.”
Maybe we need a 24/7 documentary cable channel with a citizen action focus so that fortuitous rendezvous can occur among all these parties at any given time around the ticking clock.
Here's my idea:
The wealthiest one-percent are not Philanthropists. They are not going to share their wealth. They are hoarders. They have been hoarding, like greedy fat pigs, for centuries. It's only a matter of time before they run out of money to leech and they eat themselves alive, before we do it for them.
There's no argument here, stop your internal dialogue, just no.
The solution here, (my idea) is a charity. A charity that gives the donations it receives back to the individuals that donated.
*most annoying voice you can imagine* But nobody would get money!?!?
There are 10 individuals who donate, lets say, 100$, and then an 11th individual who donates an unknown amount of money. This eleventh individual is a philanthropist.
The philanthropist chooses, as a part of the charity (The Love Foundation, for example) to not receive benefits BACK.
So instead of this philanthropist walking away with money, they walk away knowing they helped someone out; hence the entire idea behind charity.
So here's the math. Bare with me.
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
X
So at this point there is 1,000$ in the pot, and it will be evenly re-distributed to the donators at the end of the event. (bi-monthly, lets say).
Now, this is the tricky part.
Imagine for a second that this eleventh donation is a group of donations from many wealthy philanthropists across the world, lump-summed, into this final 11th donation.
HOWEVER!!!
If the total is 1,000,000,000.00$, and the
eleventh individual chose not to partake in the
winnings; then those ten people just got one-
hundred million dollars, each.
The biggest problem here being that nobody in there right mind would donate money knowing that those individuals. But to that I say:
fuckin posers. <.<... >.>...
People like to blame Nader for the Bush dynasties rule. That's fine, but it makes you look like an idiot. It's not Nader's "fault" for ruining Gore's chance, it's the people's fault for voting BUSH IN. Stop deflecting and own up to the pure stupidity that is the Ameritard majority.
I can say this, because I'm 'merican.
Patriots fight Wars.
Patriots Change Laws
Patriots chastise bad Policy and ineffective Leadership
Al Gore and Nader should have run together, it would have been better insofar as the American people not being victim to a greedy, retarded hillbilly.
I don't need to even post this. The entire world knows he is retarded; but that's what American's like about him...They like to feel that they aren't as retarded as they think they are because if this guy can be president, a broken twig in a steaming pile of elephant shit can also be a president.
And the fucked up part is, even the twig knows when the shit stinks.
George W Bush: Full Retard- YouTube
Anyways.
SO, yeah. Nader is a fantastic guy; and doesn't deserve the rap he got. His heart was in the right place; and to this day he continues to share passion and love in his work.
Nader Organization
Here is the most recent update; and I'll comment in bold.
More Exposés, Less Action
Ralph Nader
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
There must be reasons why people are weary of the flood of excellent documentary films, books and articles showing us what the corporate state – that is, the fusion of big business and government to constantly serve the former against the peoples’ interest – is doing to our beloved country. aka eating itself alive
We are in a golden age of exposés, detailed revelations about out-of-control polluters, corporate tax escapees, corruption of government, cheating of consumers, abandonment of workers, freezing or reduction of wages, and a general hijacking of America for perpetual wars, militarism and profiteering. Even from mainstream television, newspapers and magazines, these exposés pour out in numbers that far exceed our weakened democracy’s ability to respond. That's not what Fox said! -_______________-
Why does so little change when the truths, the facts and the grim realities are available on request? In the past more prosecutors, legislators, and regulators would be informed and goaded by exposés. The wider media would echo such responses which further encouraged these enforcers to challenge wrongdoing. A cycle of public agitation and official responses kept things moving.
But there were fewer exposés and therefore less information overload. Today, exposés are running into each other and receiving smaller audiences. The shrinking mass media does not give the authors and producers the time that was afforded their predecessors.
Nothing has replaced the Phil Donahue Show that reveled in showcasing injustices.The Today Show and Good Morning America have fewer authors on their stages. Charlie Rose is heavily into entertainers, favored columnist Tom Friedman, and business celebrities. Once welcoming radio talk show hosts are off the air, replaced by curled lip ideologues or soft, fluffy commentators. Local daily city television talk shows that made author tours successful and often would jump-start investigative reports are nearly extinct, replaced by syndicated programs featuring touchy-feely or sadomasochistic fare. Bill Maher's show is pretty good too, imo.
This new media landscape is more hostile to the civic community and discourages the younger generation from believing that change is truly within our grasp. As the years pass, our examples of national re-directions, as if people matter, come from the 1960s and ’70s. There are dwindling illustrations from more variously-troubled, recent decades, even as the information revolution should have accelerated the pace of change. The younger generation, aka me, is not discouraged, we are enraged, yet calm; calm like a bomb!
There may be proportionately as much civic activism today, though the smaller marches and rallies and much less mass media coverage do not demonstrate that there is as much public protest. What is certain is that there are now far more problems, declines in livelihoods, and other deprivations and lockouts from participating in our legislative and executive governments and courts. It doesn’t help that there are far fewer differences between the two major parties and far more gridlocks, garnished by far more campaign cash, resulting in chronic avoidance or postponements of remedies.
Let’s go back to the exposés. What can documentary film makers, for example, do beyond putting out a fine product for theater audiences and DVD purchasers? Educate, one organization. One charity.
An ongoing development pushing the envelope toward change comes from Eugene Jarecki’s documentary “The House I Live In.” Saturating the country with his public and private showings, action meetings with prison wardens and lawmakers – urban and rural – and continuing media coverage, he seeks to make his film “a widely-recognized and galvanizing tool for a national rethinking of America’s drug control policies.” His two-year plan of coalition building and direct legislative pressure is breathtaking in its scope, depth, agility and strategic thinking (for more information visit the website here).
Mr. Jarecki is plowing new ground through relentless follow-through – an extension more authors, capable of doing so, should undertake. After all they have proven themselves as knowledgeable, interesting communicators.
Another contemporary documentary receiving serious follow-up by its production team is “The Invisible War” – the story of rape and other sexual assaults within the U.S. military. This film, directed and written by Kirby Dick, is being taken seriously by the Pentagon which is showing it to commanders and high-ranking military leaders. Attendance is often required thanks to a few enlisted commanders and constant prodding from the filmmakers.
Realistically, many reporters and producers are unable to pursue their findings into the realms of action. Often they are onto their next investigative project and are economically hard-pressed. Here is where some farseeing foundations or enlightened wealthy persons can make a difference by funding small civic groups taking the findings and recommendations into the public policy arenas backed by civic mobilization. After all, civic advocates have proven their worth over the long run.
Or existing groups, such as the anti-nuclear steadfast organizations – Beyond Nuclear and Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS) – can be the beneficiaries of funders viewing documentaries such “Knocking on the Devil’s Door: Our Deadly Nuclear Legacy.”
Maybe we need a 24/7 documentary cable channel with a citizen action focus so that fortuitous rendezvous can occur among all these parties at any given time around the ticking clock.
Or how about a national redistribution of wealth coined as government banks, paid for and sustained by the wealthiest 1%. (Would never happen.)
However, we can still spread the love.
Here's my idea:
The wealthiest one-percent are not Philanthropists. They are not going to share their wealth. They are hoarders. They have been hoarding, like greedy fat pigs, for centuries. It's only a matter of time before they run out of money to leech and they eat themselves alive, before we do it for them.
There's no argument here, stop your internal dialogue, just no.
The solution here, (my idea) is a charity. A charity that gives the donations it receives back to the individuals that donated.
*most annoying voice you can imagine* But nobody would get money!?!?
Ah, classic fallacy. Here's how it works.
There are 10 individuals who donate, lets say, 100$, and then an 11th individual who donates an unknown amount of money. This eleventh individual is a philanthropist.
The philanthropist chooses, as a part of the charity (The Love Foundation, for example) to not receive benefits BACK.
So instead of this philanthropist walking away with money, they walk away knowing they helped someone out; hence the entire idea behind charity.
So here's the math. Bare with me.
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
100$
X
So at this point there is 1,000$ in the pot, and it will be evenly re-distributed to the donators at the end of the event. (bi-monthly, lets say).
Now, this is the tricky part.
Imagine for a second that this eleventh donation is a group of donations from many wealthy philanthropists across the world, lump-summed, into this final 11th donation.
For example: Angelina Jolie, Bill Gates, Leonardo DiCaprio, Oprah Winfrey, and any other charitable organizations that chipped into this final (X) donation.
The donation totalled, let's say, 999,999,000.00$
So, the 10 individuals who donated 100$ (because that's all they could afford, lets say, or lets say that's the minimum donation)
HOWEVER!!!
If the total is 1,000,000,000.00$, and the
eleventh individual chose not to partake in the
winnings; then those ten people just got one-
hundred million dollars, each.
The biggest problem here being that nobody in there right mind would donate money knowing that those individuals. But to that I say:
“You see things; and you say, ‘Why?’ But
I dream things that never were; and I say,
‘Why not?’"
George Bernard Shaw?
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Bill Hicks - Positive Drug Story
Everything is black and white.
There are shades of gray; but that is irrelevant.
Anything aligned along the left is something that can or is categorized by Fear.
Anything to the right of this wall is an idea or tangible object that is LOVE.
Republicans Democrats
Conservatives Liberals
George W. Bush and his retarded hillbilly family--------------------------> Sanders/Kucinich, etc.
Caffeine Weed
Alcohol Mushrooms
Cocaine Ecstasy
Heroine LSD
DMT DMT
Fox News Democracy Now!
Old Testament New Testament
Organized Religion Spirituality
Money Necessity
War Kisses
MIC Rehabilitation Clinics
PIC Rehabilitation Clinics
Government Anarchy
No Child Left Behind Anything else.
Disagree? I don't give a fuck.
Smile for sense god damnit. :P
Wake the fuck up
Every time I deal with an individual who is totally under-educated all around; it takes everything I've got to not personally wake them up myself.
So from now on; my duty on this blog will to help people do that.
Stay tuned, and smile for sense.
Every time I deal with an individual who is totally under-educated all around; it takes everything I've got to not personally wake them up myself.
So from now on; my duty on this blog will to help people do that.
Stay tuned, and smile for sense.
So from now on; my duty on this blog will to help people do that.
Stay tuned, and smile for sense.
Every time I deal with an individual who is totally under-educated all around; it takes everything I've got to not personally wake them up myself.
So from now on; my duty on this blog will to help people do that.
Stay tuned, and smile for sense.
Physics
Anyone else ever think about e=mc^2.
I was thinking today and had an epiphany, extrapolating this equation, and instead of keeping relativity separate from whatever, what if we tried to use this equation to define the undefinable under, say, QM or String theory.
If the observer has a direct connection with the experiment (ie varying conclusions while watching or not watching), then we must be the experiment?
e=mc^2(x)
If energy is determined by the mass of an object, etc, according to relativity; then how is energy defined outside of relativity?
However, this equation is OLD.
I've been researching evidence for a new equation and have only come to this:
Humans can see RBG, butterflies can see RGBxX, Dogs can see only two of what we as humans see.
If butterflies can see more than what we can see; then what is the purpose of our brains?
The purpose of our brains is to think; to rationalize. These thoughts, these rationalizations create frequencies and vibrations that are measurable; energy.
If energy is created by thoughts and vibrations in our brain, then how do we use our brain to create energy?
T=thought (I want a glass of water)
F=frequency (repeating, I want a glass of water^infinity)
W=vibration (meditate on this though, leave it at the door, continue business.)
E=WTF
?
Cheers.
Smileforsense :)
ps. my fish are hungry. ^-^
I was thinking today and had an epiphany, extrapolating this equation, and instead of keeping relativity separate from whatever, what if we tried to use this equation to define the undefinable under, say, QM or String theory.
If the observer has a direct connection with the experiment (ie varying conclusions while watching or not watching), then we must be the experiment?
e=mc^2(x)
If energy is determined by the mass of an object, etc, according to relativity; then how is energy defined outside of relativity?
However, this equation is OLD.
I've been researching evidence for a new equation and have only come to this:
Humans can see RBG, butterflies can see RGBxX, Dogs can see only two of what we as humans see.
If butterflies can see more than what we can see; then what is the purpose of our brains?
The purpose of our brains is to think; to rationalize. These thoughts, these rationalizations create frequencies and vibrations that are measurable; energy.
If energy is created by thoughts and vibrations in our brain, then how do we use our brain to create energy?
T=thought (I want a glass of water)
F=frequency (repeating, I want a glass of water^infinity)
W=vibration (meditate on this though, leave it at the door, continue business.)
E=WTF
?
Cheers.
Smileforsense :)
ps. my fish are hungry. ^-^
Friday, May 17, 2013
TGIF
Hey. It's a beautiful Friday Morning here in Powder Springs. Sun is rising right now, so I'll be short. :D
But I was thinking,
If I was to say, have a conversation with Mother Earth; I would imagine the Conversation would go something like this.
Earth: Umm, wtf r u doin?
Stahp. D:
Me: Sorry love, brb doin good deeds. <3
High on life, that is. Drugs are bad, mmkay. ;)
Smile for sense.
Cheers.
:P
<3 <8>
-->
But I was thinking,
If I was to say, have a conversation with Mother Earth; I would imagine the Conversation would go something like this.
Earth: Umm, wtf r u doin?
Stahp. D:
Me: Sorry love, brb doin good deeds. <3
High on life, that is. Drugs are bad, mmkay. ;)
Smile for sense.
Cheers.
:P
<3 <8>
-->
Dear Zanzibar entry 2
She left me a note.
This is what it said, in purple pen, on a piece of paper from her journal. It had a V on the front.
"paris? 2:43"
WTF???
I don't know if its A.M. or P.M. so it's either just passed or perpetuating itself, whatever it is, as we speak.
My eyes are peeled.
Smileforsense!
Feed my fish! -> :D
<3
-Alex
This is what it said, in purple pen, on a piece of paper from her journal. It had a V on the front.
"paris? 2:43"
WTF???
I don't know if its A.M. or P.M. so it's either just passed or perpetuating itself, whatever it is, as we speak.
My eyes are peeled.
Smileforsense!
Feed my fish! -> :D
<3
-Alex
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Wake the fuck up.
Every time I deal with an individual who is totally under-educated all around; it takes everything I've got to not personally wake them up myself.
So from now on; my duty on this blog will to help people do that.
Stay tuned, and smile for sense.
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Dense. Getting back in the game.
Here is a list of all of the emails I've been putting off. Everything here is good stuff :3.
Georgia Chapter of the Sierra Club
Bradley Manning News
Petition against the Repeal of Obamacare
Are You Pro-Choice? Click and Sign
United Wisconsin: STAND WITH VOTING RIGHTS, STAND WITH POCAN
Help Elizabeth Warren stop Republicans from doubling the interest rate on student loans!
Moveon.org:Tell Food and Retail CEOs: Your Workers Shouldn't Have To Rely On Food Stamps
Donate to Elizabeth Warren: Elizabeth Warren's first donation was to EMILY's List, and EMILY's List was one of her first supporters in her run for United States Senate.
More to come later, gotta go.
Smile for sense :3
-Alex
Georgia Chapter of the Sierra Club
Bradley Manning News
Petition against the Repeal of Obamacare
Are You Pro-Choice? Click and Sign
United Wisconsin: STAND WITH VOTING RIGHTS, STAND WITH POCAN
Help Elizabeth Warren stop Republicans from doubling the interest rate on student loans!
Moveon.org:Tell Food and Retail CEOs: Your Workers Shouldn't Have To Rely On Food Stamps
Donate to Elizabeth Warren: Elizabeth Warren's first donation was to EMILY's List, and EMILY's List was one of her first supporters in her run for United States Senate.
More to come later, gotta go.
Smile for sense :3
-Alex
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Insider Information
So I was down in Panama for a couple of hours on a business trip; I can't say why.
During my visit there, I met the wife of a secret service agent. We had a couple of drinks, I brought her to my hotel; we did a couple of lines; and I got her talking.
Her wife is a secret service agent, my informant gave me a weird piece of information that I have no way to fact check. Even mentioning the secret service puts you on a watch list. However, truth is key.
We finished an 8-ball, and she told me that the marriage between Michelle and Barack is a farce; it's a farce so that Michelle can pursue her individual agenda.
There are two sides to this information.
The first side is that this information is true, and the government is simply lying to us.
What's new.
The second side is that this is false, and my informant was drunk, and blabbed a rumor.
However, if this is true, it spur's a whole mess of cogs to turn. Why is the Obama administration keeping this a secret? What motivations does Michelle have? What is her "agenda" beyond what she's done to help disabled veterans, and education?
Most importantly, why would I have go to through so much trouble to get this information?
Welp, feed my fish, cheers, and smile for sense.
During my visit there, I met the wife of a secret service agent. We had a couple of drinks, I brought her to my hotel; we did a couple of lines; and I got her talking.
Her wife is a secret service agent, my informant gave me a weird piece of information that I have no way to fact check. Even mentioning the secret service puts you on a watch list. However, truth is key.
We finished an 8-ball, and she told me that the marriage between Michelle and Barack is a farce; it's a farce so that Michelle can pursue her individual agenda.
There are two sides to this information.
The first side is that this information is true, and the government is simply lying to us.
What's new.
The second side is that this is false, and my informant was drunk, and blabbed a rumor.
However, if this is true, it spur's a whole mess of cogs to turn. Why is the Obama administration keeping this a secret? What motivations does Michelle have? What is her "agenda" beyond what she's done to help disabled veterans, and education?
Most importantly, why would I have go to through so much trouble to get this information?
Welp, feed my fish, cheers, and smile for sense.
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Dear Zanzibar, Journal Entry One
Where have you been and where are you going?
Zanzibar, The boy in the blue mask, you can do crazy things. Everybody talks about him, but nobody has ever had a dialogue with him (except for me of course). Omniborus, my agency, has a file, but it was incomplete. Zanzibar was mysterious though, he just shows up one day, does something super fucking bad-ass, and then vanishes
I asked him why he had insisted on working solo, and this was all I got from him.
"Everyone is saying that now. I'm so tired of this."
And then he was gone, he hopped on his plane and left.
Zanzibar is intelligent, he has a lot of pride stored in his above average IQ. His teachers emphasized that he should be enrolled in some sort of scientific program, something where he would have the unlimited ability to build and explore his talents. Sarah thought this was a fantastic idea. Sarah is, well, Sarah was an entirely different character altogether. Sarah was the kind of person that picks up you and your family like puppets, and then attaches them to a very long string. She was a manipulative, heartless, murderous queen.
But I was smarter, more cunning. At twenty two I could do everything, I knew exactly the skill set Sarah learned; only I was 30 years younger. I hadn't been killing people as long as she had, but I had definitely been killing people. She had me assigned to an assassination, against policy for some childish reason. It almost blew "O"s cover. Sarah was really stupid sometimes. It doesn't make much sense to me why someone would ruin a perfect thing because got stupid. It cost her in the end though. That's for another time though.
Sarah had me in Milwaukee, Wisconsin; which is in America, on a mission to assassinate a politician back in 2010, I can't say who this politician might be for obvious reasons, however; I can say that this politician was the worst of the worst, and he didn't belong where he had gotten.
The mission was to remove him at a media event, which was easy enough, except she had me doing it at knife point, to make some sort of statement. Honestly, I think she was trying to remove me. Conventional methods were much safer, I noticed right away, the deviation from typical policy I mean.
That's where I saw you Zanzibar, your disguise was perfect.
But that's all I have time for; Reeves asked to meet me in some nowhere town in Southeastern America. Georgia. Toodles.
-Sonora
*Update, no word from informant.
Zanzibar, The boy in the blue mask, you can do crazy things. Everybody talks about him, but nobody has ever had a dialogue with him (except for me of course). Omniborus, my agency, has a file, but it was incomplete. Zanzibar was mysterious though, he just shows up one day, does something super fucking bad-ass, and then vanishes
I asked him why he had insisted on working solo, and this was all I got from him.
"Everyone is saying that now. I'm so tired of this."
And then he was gone, he hopped on his plane and left.
Zanzibar is intelligent, he has a lot of pride stored in his above average IQ. His teachers emphasized that he should be enrolled in some sort of scientific program, something where he would have the unlimited ability to build and explore his talents. Sarah thought this was a fantastic idea. Sarah is, well, Sarah was an entirely different character altogether. Sarah was the kind of person that picks up you and your family like puppets, and then attaches them to a very long string. She was a manipulative, heartless, murderous queen.
But I was smarter, more cunning. At twenty two I could do everything, I knew exactly the skill set Sarah learned; only I was 30 years younger. I hadn't been killing people as long as she had, but I had definitely been killing people. She had me assigned to an assassination, against policy for some childish reason. It almost blew "O"s cover. Sarah was really stupid sometimes. It doesn't make much sense to me why someone would ruin a perfect thing because got stupid. It cost her in the end though. That's for another time though.
Sarah had me in Milwaukee, Wisconsin; which is in America, on a mission to assassinate a politician back in 2010, I can't say who this politician might be for obvious reasons, however; I can say that this politician was the worst of the worst, and he didn't belong where he had gotten.
The mission was to remove him at a media event, which was easy enough, except she had me doing it at knife point, to make some sort of statement. Honestly, I think she was trying to remove me. Conventional methods were much safer, I noticed right away, the deviation from typical policy I mean.
That's where I saw you Zanzibar, your disguise was perfect.
But that's all I have time for; Reeves asked to meet me in some nowhere town in Southeastern America. Georgia. Toodles.
-Sonora
*Update, no word from informant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)